Tuesday, November 30, 2021

There will be blood

 We live in an age of Republican Party sanctioned and encouraged vigilantism. Kyle Rittenhouse, the murder of Trayvon Martin, “stand your ground “ laws, concealed carry laws, etc are all designed to unleash right wing hyper masculine vigilantes on the nation, targeting black and brown people and black and brown protesters. It’s not just the despicable mentally ill Trump. It’s the white supremacist twisted notion of masculinity - guns, violence, cowboy take the law in your own hands masculinity- John Wayne replaces Jesus “christianity”.  


The Rittenhouse verdict guarantees that there will be blood. The vigilante laws want blood. It’s all about putting the libs, the blacks, the browns, the reds, the yellows, the gays, the women back in their places doncha know….

Monday, November 22, 2021

When do we get to use the guns?

Two long time conservatives, Stephen Hayes and Jonah Goldberg,  have left Fox News in protest against the network’s top commentator, Tucker Carlson’s, dangerous upcoming propaganda “documentary" that will claim that the January 6 attempt to overthrow the election was actually a “false flag” operation conducted by Lefties to discredit Righties.  This is just as preposterously stupid as the claim by Trump, and aided and abetted by the Right, that the election was stolen and the heroic Trump actually won in a landslide.  (the Lefties tried to overthrow an election that they won? With the help of Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley, Paul Gosar, Matt Gaetz, Lauren Bobbert, Roger Stone, Steve Bannon, and a host of deplorables?? A claim that is just too stupid to comprehend)

This is the stuff of authoritarian fascist calls to violence.  At a Turning Points USA meeting (pro Trump group) a question arose…

“When do we get to use the guns?”

In America. 

In all likelihood the actual motivation of Carlson and the Republican Party with all of this stolen election, false flag nonsense is to justify overturning election results that go against them.  And if a few people kill others along the way, and end up in prison for a few lifetimes, well, you know, that’s just the way it goes when you do revolutions.

By the way, since The Former Guy may well end up in prison by 2024, is Carlson running for Right Wing Authoritarian King?  He is much smarter than The Former Guy, and is pretty famous, which is all that The Former Guy ever was – famous.

And also by the  way, Rittenhouse got to use his gun, didn't he? Protecting property, don't you know.....................................??

Friday, November 19, 2021

Rittenhouse verdict

The jury has spoken and young Kyle Rittenhouse was found not guilty of murder of two men.  I guess they decided it was self defense.  I wasn't at the trial and I suppose that once he was in a violent situation he got scared and killed folks. And that was the defense ... But he put himself there.  
 
I have not been following the trial much at all, other than a few things.  First, the judge seemed to be pretty anti-prosecution lawyers.  So, OK.  I doubt that the trial will be thrown out.  
 
But, what I really noticed were the photos of this white kid with an assault weapon slung over his shoulder and finger on the trigger guard.  In the middle of a chaotic night.  And ignored by the police at the scene.  What?  
 

 As has been said by many others, imagine if this had been a 17 year old black kid who came across state lines walking down a chaotic street with that weapon.  What would have been his chances of surviving the reactions of the police that night?  How about no chance in hell?
 
 

Saturday, November 13, 2021

Republican fascist death threats

 We are living in a time of the violent rise of fascism. Republican Liz Cheney has had her life threatened because she voted to impeach the Former Guy. The thirteen Republicans who voted for the needed infrastructure bill have been under death threats. It is a lie to say that there are extremist equivalents on both the Left and the Right. There are extremists who are inflexible and didactic on the left. But They did not violently try to overthrow the government. They do not run the Democratic Party. They are not issuing death threats to centrist Democrats. 

Liz Cheney- “ We now live in a country where members' votes are are affected because they're worried about their security, they're worried about threats on their lives.”

It has been said that if you wonder what you would have done in Germany in the early thirties, you don’t have to wonder. It is what we are doing now. Pretending it’s not so bad? Ignoring as much as you can and just smell the flowers? Hoping it will just go away? Vote for them anyway because you want tax breaks and deregulation? Shine an exposing light on the horrors trying to rally opposition?  Using as much political, spiritual, and metaphysical energy as you can to bring forth the Light to create a decent, inspiring world?  

Fascist threats of violence are here. Now.  This is unAmerican and unacceptable.  Let’s shine a Light and be a Light  




Monday, November 8, 2021

Finally America passes a good infrastructure bill

 Biden did what the Former Guy couldn't get done - passed a significant infrastructure bill.  What's in it?
 
  • Roads
  • Bridges
  • Rail
  • Airports and ports
  • Transmission power grids
  • High speed internet (broadband) in rural and poor areas
  • Charging stations
  • Water quality
  • Environmental cleanup
  • Weatherization 
About time.

Saturday, November 6, 2021

Infrastructure spending is not socialism

 Congress finally passed the Infrastructure Bill.  Benefits us all and grows the economy. Bravo!  But is it socialism? Of course not. Here is an essential understanding of history from the historian Heather Cox Richardson. I present her work as written tonight to honor her and try to educate:

As soon as the Democrats in the House of Representatives, marshaled by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), passed the $1.2 trillion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (H.R. 3684) by a bipartisan vote of 228–206 last night, Republicans began to say that the Democrats were ushering in “socialism.”

When Republicans warn of socialism, they are not talking about actual socialism, which is an economic system in which the means of production, that is, the factories and industries, are owned by the people. In practical terms, that means they are owned by the government.

True socialism has never been popular in America, and virtually no one is talking about it here today. The best it has ever done in a national election was in 1912, when labor organizer Eugene V. Debs, running for president as a Socialist, won a whopping 6% of the vote, coming in behind Woodrow Wilson, Theodore Roosevelt, and William Howard Taft. True socialism isn't a real threat in America.

What politicians mean when they cry “socialism” in America today is something entirely different. It is a product of the years immediately after the Civil War, when Black men first got the right to vote.

Eager to join the free labor system from which they had previously been excluded, these men joined poor white men to vote for leaders who promised to rebuild the South, provide schools and hospitals (as well as desperately needed prosthetics for veterans), and develop the economy with railroads to provide an equal opportunity for all men to work hard and rise.

Former Confederates loathed the idea of Black men voting. But their opposition to Black voting on racial grounds ran headlong into the Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which, after it was ratified in 1870, gave the U.S. government the power to make sure that no state denied any man the right to vote “on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” When white former Confederates nonetheless tried to force their Black neighbors from the polls, Congress in 1870 created the Department of Justice, which began to prosecute the Ku Klux Klan members who had been terrorizing the South.

With racial discrimination now prohibited by the federal government, elite white southerners changed their approach. They insisted that they objected to Black voting not on racial grounds, but because Black men were voting for programs that redistributed wealth from hardworking white people to Black people, since hospitals and roads would cost tax dollars and white people were the only ones with taxable property in the Reconstruction South. Poor Black voters were instituting, one popular magazine wrote, "Socialism in South Carolina."

This idea that it was dangerous for poor working men to have a say in the government caught on in the North as immigrants moved into growing cities to work in the new factories. Like their counterparts in the South, they voted for roads and schools, and northern men of wealth too insisted these programs meant a redistribution of wealth through tax dollars.

They got more concerned still when a majority of Americans began to call for regulation to keep businessmen from gouging consumers, polluting the environment, and poisoning the food supply (milk was preserved with formaldehyde, and candy was often painted with lead paint). Wealthy men argued that any attempt to regulate business would impinge on a man's liberty, while an army of bureaucrats to enforce regulations would cost tax dollars and thus would mean a redistribution of wealth from men of means to the poor who would benefit from the regulations.

Long before the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia brought the fears of a workers' government to life, Americans who opposed regulation insisted that their economy was under siege by socialists. That conviction did indeed lead to a redistribution of wealth, but as regular Americans were kept from voting, it went dramatically upward, not down.

Regulation of business and promotion of infrastructure is not, in fact, the international socialism today’s Republicans claim. According to Abraham Lincoln, who first articulated the principles of the Republican Party, and under whom the party invented the American income tax, the “legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves---in their separate, and individual capacities.” Those things included, he wrote, “public roads and highways, public schools, charities, pauperism, orphanage, estates of the deceased, and the machinery of government itself.”



Thursday, November 4, 2021

Running against the Former Guy only works against the Former Guy

The Democrat, McAuliffe, lost to the Republican, Younkin, in the Virginia Governor's race - 51 -48%.  (Please note that there are no hysterical and ludicrous screams of a "stolen election")
 
Three things that I note.  First, the main focus of the McAuliffe campaign seems to have been to tie Younkin to the Former Guy.  Didn't work.  The Former Guy was and is a hateful, toxic personality, but Republicans like to vote for Republicans, especially if they are not hateful, toxic personalities.  So it is fine to make some mention of the Former Guy, I guess, but you need to have your campaign be about something much more real about yourself and your opponent and your vision of the future.

The second thing is that we live in tribes, centered primarily on personal and tribal identity, and the Reps are enraged by Dems trying to enforce Dem tribal values on them - mandating vaccines and teaching about racism for example.  Terrifyingly, a substantial percentage of Reps are white supremacists, so what to do?  I think the Dems are best campaigning on positive visions that include justice and equality and do their best not to make those who think of themselves as unbiased as being under the accusation of racism.  Deal with racism in policy, not in a campaign.  Campaign on other visions.
 
Push for policies of social justice, but for goodness sake DO NOT RUN ON DE-FUNDING THE POLICE.  Police reform is great, but it should not be about de-funding.  Re-direct funds to specially trained social worker/enforcement officers to deal with the mentally ill of the homeless, deal with social issues of domestic disturbance, etc. - that should be a welcome relief for the police to be able to be rid of dealing with mental issues and deal instead with real crime.  We all know we need the police.  Reps especially seem to be sensitive to the threat of crime.  Don't attack the police in campaigns.  

My big takeaway is Dems need to love their progressive wing, and encourage their ideas, but do not run as a radical lefty unless you are in a 40% safe Dem district.  And then, do not try to take over the Democratic Party once elected - you don't have the votes outside of left wing enclaves.  Take what wins you can and stop trying to force a view that gets votes only in the most left wing districts.

Tuesday, November 2, 2021

The purpose of political lies

An old acquaintance recently wrote to me that their teenage child said that truth is dead, that nobody can know the truth anymore, and that to insist on the truth was wrong and judgemental and arrogant. I am sure that both the parent and the child are sincere and very wonderful people, but it shows me how far the attack on truth has gone.  When the truth is discounted, democracy fails, and authoritarians take over.  The brilliant Hannah Arendt, the German philosopher that had intimately observed the Hitler and Nazi atrocities made this very important observation:
 

“If everybody always lies to you, the consequence is not that you believe the lies, but rather that nobody believes anything any longer… And a people that no longer can believe anything cannot make up its mind. It is deprived not only of its capacity to act but also of its capacity to think and to judge. And with such a people you can then do what you please.”

 
We are in a terrible time where the former president of the United States has created the most blatant, ridiculous, unbelievable lie in the history of this country - that he did not lose the election to Biden but actually won it in a landslide and the election was stolen from him.  He lost by 8 million votes, so who on earth could believe such a clumsy and stupid lie?  Well, about two thirds of Republicans say they believe this lie.  I don't know if they actually believe the lie or are they just saying so in order to demonstrate they are part of the Red Tribe, and it gives them justification for using any and all tactics to thwart the 2020 election.  But, that is what they say.
 
The lie is not to convince the already convinced, and it is not to convince the opposition, who know it is a lie.  The lie is to confuse the teenager mentioned above, and all those in the middle, so that they say - Who Knows?  One side says this and the other side says that, so everyone has their own truth, who can decide? No one wants to be judgmental after all...
 
This is how Hitler becomes Hitler and the Former Guy gets to become the new Hitler.  Very dangerous.